The 4Cs, by the evidence
Cohort-wide mastery against the four capabilities the program claims to develop, plus AI literacy. Each score aggregates assignment-level signals, not grades.
Cohort radar · Spring 2026
Cohort mastery profile
Mean across 28 students
This term
Last term
Movement vs. last term
Capability shift, points
Assignments mapped to capabilities
Each assignment produces signals across one or more capabilities. Cell intensity is the strength of the signal that capability can be measured by this assignment — not the average score. Risk is the AI-related validity risk per the guide's framework.
Coverage view · 8 assignments × 5 capabilities
| Assignment | Critical thinking | Communication | Collaboration | Creativity | AI literacy | Validity risk | Completion |
|---|
Where each student stands
Per-student capability scores and 8-week trend. Click a row in production to see the underlying process evidence — drafts, peer reviews, annotation behavior, AI-disclosure logs.
28 students · sortable in production
| Student | CT | Comm | Collab | Creat | AI lit. | 8-wk trend | Flag |
|---|
What you should do about it
Insights derived from the evidence above, prioritized for the role you've selected. The next-step actions are the moves the guide's Chapter 10 patterns would recommend.
3 prioritized recommendations
Where this signal came from
A learning intelligence platform infers capability scores from the artifacts of the assignment workflow itself. These are the signals the prototype is reading.
| Signal source | What it tells us | Maps to | Coverage |
|---|